Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Rituals in a Throwaway Society: Disposable Culture

So this is the last post in the series. Sorry, it's taken me a while to complete. I think one should always write the whole series first, then post them over time rather than starting the series and trying to keep on top of it. Live and learn.

My sister Heather loves traditions. This has always been true in my memory of her and it's not surprising given the hearty stock of sentimentalists from which we come, but it really took off during her adolescence. Particularly at Christmas time during her high school and college years, Heather became so enthralled with traditions that it seemed like she invented a new one every Christmas during that decade or so. Finding out what the new tradition was each December became a bit of its own tradition. But it wasn't exactly sustainable. As we grew up and moved out of our parents' house and started our lives on our own, we had to let go of some those traditions. We especially couldn't keep adding traditions to the experience.

If traditions create culture, I wonder if the speed of our lives today has put cultures themselves in jeopardy. Obviously, throughout the course of human history, cultures have come and endured and then gone. The Aztecs, the Mayans, the Roman Empire, whole civilizations have been born, reigned for a time and slowly or instantly evaporated. I recently became familiar with a theory called Transculturalism through the book of the same name, which asserts that cultures are merging in new ways creating a new way of life that crosses cultures in unprecendented ways. The book is a collection of essays by well-traveled hipsters, many of whom are of multiple races or have had experiences living outside of their ethnic culture which have had dramatic influences on their worldview. It also deals with cultural phenomena like Cuban-Chinese restaurants and Scandinavians who enjoy hip hop. In a way, I think transculturatlism is a wonderful concept, and if true, a positive step toward understanding each other in the human experience.

The problem, as I see it in the West , (from my very Western worldview,) is that we are not truly experiencing a new crossing of cultures which takes us to a new richer culture. We are being encouraged, if not forced, into a singular culture. Although it pretends at preserving bits of lots of cultures, it mercilessly mashes traditions and the uniqueness of those cultures to a pulp, unrecognizable, vanilla and tolerable. It's done in the name of political correctness, of tolerance and anti-racism, in the name of a global marketing scheme, of simplicity.

Whatever the motives, what is effectively taking place is the disposing of existing cultures, sometimes with each passing generation, often much more quickly than that. Think of the Irish immigration to the states at the close of the 19th century. Where are they today? Do their offspring eat the same foods or sing the same songs? Think of the fact that there are more Puerto Ricans in New York than in Puerto Rico. Are they New Yorkers now--street vendor hot dog, rice and beans or bagel with schmeer? Think of the fact that wealthy Americans want to build massive castles in the suburbs that look awful and unique from the exterior, but all serve the same purpose on the interior--to allow them to gather around the same granite countertops and stainless appliances as the Joneses for a meal prior to sitting down to watch cable shows that are in some subtle way about themselves. Welcome to TLC America.

What's so amazing is that individuality is dying on the altar of a one-world culture. What unites us in our cultural groups--national/ethnic traditions, religious belief and practice, musical preference--what makes us feel part of a group is that there is something unique about that subset of humanity. If we're all becoming one big fat world culture, there will not be anything unique about any of us. Is disposable culture really disposable identity? Are we all giving in to be part of the cool kids crowd? Is there any help for distinct culture in the west? Melting pot, mosaic or masher? More questions than answers.

Take this shirt--polyester white trash made in nowhere...

3 comments:

Larry said...

Ever read the apacolyptic books of Scripture? Could part of this be their fulfillment?

I really don't believe as the world shrinks that we will escape the world culture. There will be glimpses of different cultures, but maybe Gene Rodenberry the creator of Star Trek was not so far off base with his character development for the series.

I do believe though that this is a golden opportunity for evangelism and so I don't bemoan the fact that culture is shrinking. This means that as we are more alike, cultural barriers that often stood in the way of the Gospel will be much less of an impediment. Westernized culture will have less of a hold, so we better make sure that our brand of Christianity is authentic and not some mishmash of fundamentalist/evangelical/neo-con/nationalistic jargon that much of the evangelical world has adopted as truth. I fear that will do more to harm us in this merging culture than it will open the world to the message of grace and, yes, changed lifestyles, is Jesus.

Phil said...

i'd like to discuss this with you over lunch. :)

blogblogblog said...

Larry,
I guess I have to disagree with the notion that the pulverization of culture is good for evangelism. I feel like the culture currently being embraced is inoffensive and bland. That's the prevailing value of the new western culture. This is the reason for my concern in the first place. As far as evangelism goes, the gospel must offend if it be true. The Spirit cannot convict in a comfortable way. No matter which version of the gospel someone is sharing, if it is true gospel, it can and often does offend. The gospel of tolerance often comes into conflict with the gospel of Christ.

So with respect, I disagree that this shift is good for the church.