Wednesday, August 30, 2006

Ministry in the City

So, I have this weird feeling sometimes like I shouldn't blog about a subject that is too deep or heavy after not posting for a long time. (Phil, you noticed. How sweet.) But I've got nothing else and this has been on my mind a lot lately. I guess I haven't blogged a lot about life in the Kroc world. If you don't know anything about Salvation Army Kroc Centers go here. Who am I kidding? No strangers read this blog.

Anyway, I've been dragging this article home in my bag every night intending to read it after everyone goes to bed or something. It's by Tim Keller, pastor of the vibrant Redeemer Presbyterian Church in the City. In my estimation, he is one of the most important voices on the church today in urban areas worldwide. In a presentation at the Redeemer Global Network Conference, Tim presented on ministry along five fronts necessary in major city-centers. You can read the whole thing here.

This is what he recommends: "City-center churches should have as equal as possible emphases on: a) welcoming, attracting, and engaging secular/non-Christian people; b) character change through deep community and small groups; c) holistically serving the city (and especially the poor) in both word and deed; d) producing cultural leaders who integrate faith and work in society; and e) routinely multiplying itself into new churches with the same vision." He then goes on to say that many churches do one or two of these things with a high level of effectiveness, but fall short, outright fail or completely ignore others. His argument is that we need to be doing all five in a balanced way.

As I contemplate the opportunity in front of us with the Kroc Centers, and specifically ours in Uphams Corner, I know there's a lot to talk about and many have. Many have spoken about
the gift and whether we should have accepted it, the changes it will bring about in the larger Army world, whether it's possible to keep the Salvation in The Salvation Army (the argument about where the C went in YMCA), about whether it's right or wrong to lure people closer to Christ by attracting them to a pool with a waterslide.

For me, I guess, I feel like we're building a new corps in the city. We're building CHRUCH AND, not "swim and gym and oh, by the way, a little Jesus", not Gold's Gym with a cross or shield on it. If the Kroc Center we're building truly is and will be church first and everything else second, yes, it will look different from the churches we grew up in, but hey, no corps I ever attended had a coffee bar either and we all want to be like Willow Creek. If the Kroc really is church first, then I feel like we are ideally placed to succeed in almost all of these areas, perhaps going five for five.

a) welcoming, attracting, and engaging secular/non-Christian people -- Hello! If we can't attract people to this incredible place, we're in big trouble. The big challenge I see here is the engaging of non-Christian people. The question everyone asks is whether they truly will come to swim or dance or get tutoring and cross over to the chapel. I don't get the fear here. It seems like we do this with all kind of Army programming (and generally the Church does this too). In the past, it seems like we felt comfortable that the ceramics class was nice, but it was easy to get people away from the kiln and move them toward the altar? Is the fear that the "fun elements" of a Kroc center will be too much fun and people won't want to move to the quieter side of the bulding where the chapel is? Begs the question, why can't they get saved in the pool or the computer room. Overall, though, we've got this one well pegged.

b) character change through deep community and small groups -- can only speak for Kroc Boston, but we have a deep community already on Vernon Street (Roxbury Corps which will move in to Krocsbury) and a deep community, though secular in its organization, on Dudley Street. It's there waiting. All we need to do is layer the small groups over the top and do them well. The big question here is can we put the Kingdom over the Congregation, Salvation over Statistics?

c) holistically serving the city (and especially the poor) in both word and deed -- be The Salvation Army. Perhaps the simplest of all of them for us as a movement.

d) producing cultural leaders who integrate faith and work in society -- the challenge for all churches. Kroc has a unique advantage though in that we hope those who come through our doors are spending a lot of time there--kids in daycare and afterschool programs, seniors in a daily program, sports leagues, cultural clubs, workforce development programs. The theory is that we will be touching many aspects of people's lives so that we should be able to have a large impact in those multiple areas, helping people to learn to "think Christianly" (Keller's words)

e) routinely multiplying itself into new churches with the same vision -- at once the biggest and not the biggest challenge. The Army makes people jump through too many hoops to plant a corps and yet doesn't provide adequate structure to sustain plants, ironic. That's why this is a challenge. We're not going to plant more corps in cities with Kroc centers because of resources we're already pouring into those cities for Kroc. But, what if new fellowship groups started to spring up within and around the area where Kroc centers are going? What if people understood that they could come to Kroc as a primary gathering point and for life enrichment activities, but could get tied in to the existing corps down the street from them as their worshipping community. Kroc should not steal soldiers from area corps, but should serve as a conduit for new contacts at South End, Jubilee House, Dorchester Hispanic, etc. Again, provided we can have a larger view than we usually possess.

This is way too long for a blog. But I guess I've just spilled out lots of stuff I've been wrestling with. I think my observations are over-simplified and optimistic, but how else can I be when I'm working on the most complicated thing I've ever been a part of and the one that holds the greatest opportunity for the Kingdom? Keeping it simple is a survival tactic. Being hopeful that God will accomplish what He wants to do there is exactly what I want to do.

7 comments:

Larry said...

Drew,

Great post. In fact, I blogged on gym and swim last week. The fact is, whatever it takes to get people to develop meaningful relationships with missionally-minded Christians, is what we need to do! I think we argue way too much about the means of grace and forget that grace is what is important for people to experience.

The key as you have noted is culturally aware leadership with a holistic vision of what it means to be in ministry.

The Kroc Centers are an incredible challenge going forward to us. We need to make sure they are culturally sensitive and the leadership of the centers is committed to mission and service to the underserved!

David and Julie Robbins said...

As to the point "Will the Kroc Centers change the Army?", yes that danger is there, but only really for those communities that have applied for and accepted the "gift". Will they change the "corporate" Army - no, I really don't think so. My corps may never have the money to have a pool even a small one let alone a water slide so it makes no difference that The Salvation
Army got this gift. The impact is local, the challenge is local to keep Christ at the center and to keep the message of the Cross at the center of the Kroc centers. So may God send througout the years leaders able to stay faithful to the foundation and not be distracted by the pool and waterslide.

Jason said...

Drew,

Great blog, thank you.

I think there is something to planting new corps and redirecting Kroc members to other corps rather than just the latter.

Lately, I have really been focused on the idea of reproducing churches. By reading stories of church planting movements and cell churches and comparing them to the early church and early army I have begun to think that this is the heartbeat of the army actually being a "movement" and not just an institution.

I think corps planting new corps best plants the seed of global mission in the hearts of soldiers and corps members. The idea of a global theology of mission for me flows from Genesis 12:3 where Abraham is told that he will be a blessing to all the families or people groups on earth. In the new testament we are told we are part of this promise as spiritual heirs to Abraham. The pattern of Acts 1:8 where the gospel continues to move from Jerusalem to the ends of the earth and many other examples throughout scripture have shaped my thinking that the greatest possible impact the church can make on the earth is to continue to reproduce churches that have a seperate administration and leadership.

I realize that the administration probably won't allow the Kroc to plant another corps but to me this might mean the corps misses the opportunity to participate to its fullest capacity in world mission.

Phil said...

(great post to make your re-entry)

I think I may be coming in on the skeptical side, but it seems to me that the answer to the question, "Will the Kroc Centers change the Army?" is:

by God, I hope so.

To me, the LAST thing we need is more churches, if you mean church in the traditional sense. The steeple sense. In fact, we need less of these standalone church buildings and more innovative structures where we can be salt and light.

As to getting people to "think Christianly"? Is that really possible without a heart change?

Love the point about getting saved in a swimming pool. Salvation Marines, anyone?

HS said...

thanks for the lead on Keller's article. I, too, am entering the Kroc arena. After nearly 20 years of ministry in the city, I find myself in small town USA with a Kroc site. Yet the challenges of the poorest among us seem no different from Hough or Philadelphia. I am convinced that we can develop a facility that will be welcoming to many, and begin to build relationships in any corner of the building. It's an exciting time to be in this battle!

HilaryCW said...

wow, a waterslide, huh? sounds like loads of fun! I guess that's part of the problem, yeah? To me, a church, like Phil said, is just a building, and can sometimes be molded into traditional, ritualistic worship (please don't take that as negative). I see Kroc as being the complete 180 of that. How can we reach more people in a different way. This isn't the 50s anymore. Families don't worship together as much as they used to, they barely see each other sometimes, and so KrocBoston is filling a need in the community-family. It also is about that relationship. These activities, programs, and services that Kroc will provide bring the public in to receive a public service - so be it, but they have to interact with someone - hopefully that someone will be a loving, open, welcoming CHristian someone that shines Jesus. That may prompt them to ask, seek, search. We hear about it all the time, Christian who are just who they are and can share their love with others by not shoving it down other's throats. So that might be the beginning of MegaChurch KrocBoston! wow, then you'd have to preach too!:)

btw, need a lifeguard?

The Hamons said...

AWESOME stuff, Drew. I agree wholeheartedly with your critique of Tim Keller as "one of the most important voices on the church today in urban areas worldwide." If the Army can take cues from the vision God's given him and that Redeemer has beautifully incarnated in the ministry of its Kroc Centers, amazing things can happen. It's exciting for me to see, as someone who has been out of regular contact with the Army's minisry for some time, this sort of passion, drive and vision for the Kingdom. God Bless you in your endeavors.